(< <O> ॐ
wait do people from down under pronounce axiom with a long I sound? if so, I take back everything I said
@MEGALODON777hs said in #22:
> wait do people from down under pronounce axiom with a long I sound? if so, I take back everything I said
No please we are not quite that primitive...... The mighty Roy seems to be going through some stream withdrawal symptoms
> wait do people from down under pronounce axiom with a long I sound? if so, I take back everything I said
No please we are not quite that primitive...... The mighty Roy seems to be going through some stream withdrawal symptoms
@Swarm_of_NPCs said in #18:
> All that was a bunch of text and said something or not; it was somehow related to chess, I suppose.
I can assure you that there is some chess in there somewhere!
I suppose this goes to show how rare such discussions are within the chess community, where content is often dominated by things such as the millionth explanation of well-trodden concepts like the Carlsbad structure or similar. It seems that posts exploring more abstract aspects of chess do not count as 'chess posts.'
In the interest of professionalism, I will avoid making a joke refencing your username :)
> All that was a bunch of text and said something or not; it was somehow related to chess, I suppose.
I can assure you that there is some chess in there somewhere!
I suppose this goes to show how rare such discussions are within the chess community, where content is often dominated by things such as the millionth explanation of well-trodden concepts like the Carlsbad structure or similar. It seems that posts exploring more abstract aspects of chess do not count as 'chess posts.'
In the interest of professionalism, I will avoid making a joke refencing your username :)
Reveal The Cobra's Strike www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNFnc_27hGQ
I have no idea where you were going with the thing as I didn't read much of it - seemed too abstract for chess - but it seems to me learning chess is about collecting tools to let the brain use them during a game. Discussions are interesting but I'm afraid explaining the Carlsbad structure is more relevant to the game itself.
I don't really want to argue though - you probably do have some reason to write such long articles.
I don't really want to argue though - you probably do have some reason to write such long articles.
@DailyInsanity said in #24:
>
> In the interest of professionalism, I will avoid making a joke refencing your username :)
Professionalism or not, I would not recommend making jokes of jokes anyway.
>
> In the interest of professionalism, I will avoid making a joke refencing your username :)
Professionalism or not, I would not recommend making jokes of jokes anyway.
Consider me teased
I took the time now to read more of the article itself. The idea is a good one as far as I could tell - but man did you ever defend it beforehand. You explained it to the death before you told the reader what it was. Besides, under all the parallels, other examples and definitions that have nothing to do with chess, it looks like more or less the same idea any other trainer might have.
Idea: 7 out of 10
Camouflage skills: 10 out of 10
Idea: 7 out of 10
Camouflage skills: 10 out of 10
I will read it when you provide a 1 paragraph summary. So many words about very little - chatgpt would be proud!